Who created men God or Darwin?

jolope, I've never heard it said that way. That is a good example showing that there is indeed a GOD!

WOW. That's the best explanation I have ever heard!

Cool!~ this is the 1st time I've heard this one, haha

Yes, before I commented there are so many others who have got their views. But I go with Darwin.

Thanks for discussion.

While you can claim a missing link in the fossil record there is none in the human genome. This argument is outdated. There is no missing link.

Hi Forslahiri,

I think you know only the 'missing link' and nothing beyond that. Do you exactly know what is the 'missing link'? If know do elaborate here or else please do not so your pseudo intellectually. That Darwin was right in his concretion is being strengthened by the neo Darwinians.

Accruing to Einstein God never bothers if you believe on not in God. He just gave an example of the vastness of the universe. The universe is so big that the planet called Earth is like a particle of sand and you are no body at all, hence if you believe or not believe makes no sense and therefore I have supported Darwin that Men were not created by God but it came be today's form only because of evolution.

HahahahaROFL

I happen to believe in evolution as I've always been a science "nerd"--nope we didn't exactly evolve from monkeys, apes or gorillas but a branch of the primate family...it was around the Ramapithicus some four million years ago that one branch of the primate family group that branch out...the one continued the "monkey" line while the other branched to what would be the human line beginning with Australopithecus--oh, and I do happen to believe in a "higher" force as well, despite my interest in science

Hi Barb42! I can understand your point. But the fact is that when evolution was taking place the climate and the environment was friendly to suit that. Later when that atmosphere was over all the animals as pointed out by you remained in the same sape. Darwin has proof of this that the origin of man goes to the apes.

What proof does Darwin have that out proves the Bible? I believe the Word of God is true and HE says that he made man in HIS image. And I don't think God is an ape. I'll just have to be one of the no sayers. I believe the Word over Darwin.

Barb42 have you studied science at all? I've studied astronomy, geology, paleontology, anthropology and archeology...the proof of the whole evolutionary process is in the fossil evidence that has been found

Barb: "I'll ask any Darwin believer why the monkeys, apes, gorillas, etc., haven't become extinct if we evolved from them. "

The answer to this question is, "we didn't". We did not evolve from monkeys or gorillas, though we did evolve from apes. More specifically, we are apes, and so are monkeys and gorillas. We share a common ancestor with them, but they are not our ancestors. Think of them as cousins.


Barb: "And why are women having babies?"
Because we need to procreate in order for the species to survive.



Barb:"And why aren't animals having CHILDREN, if we evolved from them?"
*Sigh* That is simply not how evolution works. The transition from species to species is gradual. No one member of a species just gives birth to a completely different species. It takes time and numerous genetic changes.


Barb:"It is a stretch of the imagination to think we came from an animal."

Given that we are animals ourselves, it is only logical to accept that we descended from other animals. I suppose you find it far more logical that we were created instantaneously out of a pile of dust by an invisible man in the sky?

"I suppose you find it far more logical that we were created instantaneously out of a pile of dust by an invisible man in the sky?"

Yes, I believe that GOD created the first woman and man. Darwin's 'truth' was just a theory,nothing else.

"Darwin's 'truth' was just a theory,nothing else. "

Scientific theories are far more than conjecture. They are as close to the truth as you can get in science.

In the case of evolution - it isn't contested. It happens, we've seen it and tested it.

Barb has no answer to Pyewacket and Latrivia. Your points are quite out side the context and your clutching around the God thing is too hypothetical and Derwin did not say for nothing. His theories are based on practical finding.

Barb42, you have no idea what you are talking about. Darwin never said that we were once monkeys, apes etc. Primates all evolved from a species that were around millions of years ago, which were neither humans nor apes, but which separated into different groups and evolved further on their own, to fit their new environments, resulting in the primate species that live today. No one ever said that humans were once monkeys.
Also, why would animals have human children, if that is what you were implying? How does the fact that animals do not give birth to human children disprove the theory of evolution? The reason that billions of different species exist is that as a species spread out, the organisms that are best fitted to that place will survive and reproduce, while ones that are not fitted to the new environment will die. Therefore, the genes of the organisms that are best fitted to the new environment live on, to produce organisms that are better and better fitted to the environent. For example, the beings that the human race evolved from originated in Africa. The ones with the darkest skin survived the fierce sun. As the species spread out to Europe and Asia, dark skin was no longer a necessity, and so members of the species with slightly lighter skin survived each generation, until everyone in Europe and Asia had pale skin.

I believe Darwin's theory is a diabolical theory that was devised by the devil to confuse man and cast doubt in his mind that there is indeed One and True living God who perfectly designed man.

You are right and I too believe this. I say the concept of God is all hypothesis and the theory of Darwin is all concrete and there are proves that men' ancestors were the apes.

You belie in God. Just tell me how he created men. All these stories are to be fool men in general.

Hi Pose! I do have all respect for your faith on the Almighty. But just reflect upon Darwin's theory of Natural selection and you would find proof that men came to this world only through evolution. And there is no denying that fact.

Hi Again krajibg, Thank you and I also respect your beliefs. Blessings.

Yes I go wit you to a limited way only. I would not go eye to eye with you when you say He gave us. Not he have us but we got them so because of evolution. All the holly or unholy books were written by shrewd people like you and me and tried to rule over people with poring the belief that God is there. Whereas no God was seen bu=y any one.

You said just my version. But people are with all lethal wepon to attack us. So be careful friend.

Ye I respect your Bible. But tell me who wrote the Bible? Was not it a man? And visualize the time when a man or a group of men did so. They wanted to make people believe that there is supreme power called God. But now? how would you interpret the bible and the theory of evolution by Darwin?

One or the other you have to believe.

First of all - - - rroshanr - - speak for yourself. You may look like a monkey, but I sure don't!

The only missing link was Darwin's mind!

Evolution is a farce. Mankind has a spirit, and animals have only a soul. the two are not the same. God is not an animal, and He created mankind in "His own image."

Simple faith accepts God's Word.

The unregenerate mind of humanity will never figure God out, or His ways and or His creation.

I like the scripture that says: "professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and their foolish hearts were "darkened."

I have no problem with the fact that mankind are a species of animal.

no greater and no lesser than other animals, just different. in the same way an elephant and a whale are different.

I have no problem believing that we are descended from other varieties of ape. our DNA is barely different at all.

I can see enough evidence for evolution around me for me to be confident in it's existance. you only have to look at dog breeds, and how they've changed in a lifetime to see how changes come about based on environment, and on who gets to breed.

I find it much easier to believe in evolution than in any of the modern religions.

Hi Galena, the comparison was not silly. There was an implied metaphor. This was either God or the theory of Darwin? What Darwin sis was all based on scientific analysis. And you are the stern believer on Hod. Well God is all hypothesis and Derwin is all practical. And that made the hell of difference. If you call the color of milk is red it would not be red but would remain ever white.

And that is what is the theory of Darwin.

but Drwin could not have created his own species, it was around before he was born.

he simply came up with the idea for the most likely origins of his own species, which happened long before his birth

Hi Galena! the comparison was not between God and Darwin. It was rather between God's creation and what the theories of Darwin have to say. Thats all.